Here's Why The 'Titanic' Movie Cost More Than The Ship Itself

Posted by Kelle Repass on Monday, April 15, 2024

When it involves the entertainment trade, strategies of constructing films and television shows have reworked beyond our wildest desires. While a film's price range being masses of millions of dollars has turn into a common number in the industry, this was once no longer the case two decades ago. In 1997, James Cameron created what became the costliest movie ever, "Titanic"!

The movie, which stars none other than Oscar-winning actors, Kate Winslet, and Leonardo DiCaprio, had a whopping price range of $2 hundred million! This marked the first-ever film to cost that much. It didn't take too long before James Cameron broke his personal record in 2010 with "Avatar". Although the film cost relatively a bit of of cash, it turns out the film was more expensive than the actual ship itself!

Related: This One Scene In 'Titanic' Was Actually Real, And Not CGI

$200 Million Movie

"Titanic" was once launched in 1997 and right away became one of the largest motion pictures in history! The movie grossed $2.2 billion international and broke numerous data, including being one among the most expensive films to make. James Cameron, the movie screenplay writer, and director spent a whopping $2 hundred million on the movie itself, and that is sooner than any advertising and marketing costs. This marked "Titanic" as the costliest movie in history, a file they held for over a decade!

While films equivalent to "Pirates Of The Caribbean", "Avengers: Endgame" and "Spider-Man" have all surpassed "Titanic's" report, $200 for a 90s movie used to be relatively the shocker! Not best did the movie cost an arm and a leg to make, but it surely actually costed more to make the movie than it did to make the precise 1912 Titanic ship. According to a lot of sources, the actual ship cost $7.5 million USD all over its time of construction, which took place between 1910 to 1912.

The Titanic was designed through none different than Thomas Andrews, who was once portrayed by way of Victor Joseph Garber in the movie. Considering it cost $7.Five million to construct over 100 years ago, that would come up to about $400 million today! The film would additionally in all probability have cost much less today than in the 90s, with how much our generation had advanced.

Related: Titanic: How Much Would The "Heart Of The Ocean" Diamond Necklace Be Worth Today?

In addition to the film itself costing fairly some huge cash, much of the budgets of the motion pictures did not even move against the solid! For example, Leonardo DiCaprio agreed to a wage lower in desire of being profitable off of the gross field workplace numbers, which clearly served him higher! Leonardo ended up walking away with a $50 million paycheck for his role as Jack Dawson. As for Kate Winslet, she permitted the identical deal, incomes $2 million upfront, and making hundreds of thousands more after the movie's box-office luck.

James Cameron was once imply to earn $8 million from the movie but forfeited his wage as the cost was once getting too prime. Luckily for him, he controlled to make his $8 million after which some! Additionally, one side of the film that for sure cost somewhat a lot of money where the real and original pictures of the sunken Titanic ship. James Cameron and his film team had to dive down into the Atlantic Ocean 12 occasions in an effort to seize the scenes of the shipwreck. For $Two hundred million, the end consequence used to be not simplest stunning but very much value it!

Next: Titanic Had Solved And Unsolved Mysteries

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTErZ%2Bippeoe6S7zGifnqqVqHq4tNhmq6GdXam2ta3NoppmpZ%2BrtqZ5wqiqrWWdpL%2BmedOhmKdlpJ2ybr%2FHoqdmoaSosq2yjg%3D%3D